COP 21: Coping with a cop-out or decoupling?

There is a mixture of hope and cynicism ahead of the COP 21 climate meeting in Paris this November. Hope because the well-being of people and the planet depend on drastically reducing greenhouse gas emissions, cynicism because past meetings have failed to produce anything that would avert a climate crisis—which is where we seem to be headed. But beyond the outcome of this next meeting, a climate agreement will only be part of the solution; the move towards a low-emissions society will require progress on many other fronts.

This is not to say that global climate agreements do not matter. They do. When the international community comes together to seriously commit to curbing CO2 and other greenhouse gases, this is meaningful action to combat climate change. Similarly, it mattered when countries united to ban ozone-harming CFCs in 1987 under the Montreal Protocol. We were able to phase out the use of these harmful substances and prevent us all from getting skin cancer.

But the problem with the ongoing climate negotiations is not that they don’t have the potential to make a meaningful impact, but that countries who participate in them lack the political will and grit to make this happen. While commitments may be international, their implementation takes place in individual countries. The international collaboration to phase out CFCs might seem like a guiding example, however the solution to the climate problem is much more complex and expensive.

Continue reading

Defining Agroecology

Without agroecology we won’t be able to both nourish our growing population and preserve the natural environment. Unfortunately, agroecology is not a specific method that will bring us to this outcome. It is a general category of agriculture that maximizes “productivity, energy conservation, climate health, biodiversity (and related ecosystem services), soil and water conservation, and profitability.” (LUPG) It inevitably takes different forms, as each growing environment is distinct and there are many ways to fulfill these requirements within each place, but it always implies holistic sustainability and high food productivity.

Agroecology is a necessary component of ‘sustainable intensification’—producing more food on the same area of land without degrading the environment. While the latter term is liberally used to describe a number of food production models, the ones that focus exclusively on intensification—such as industrial pork production—are hardly worthy of being called ‘sustainable.’ True sustainable intensification adheres to agroecology. Continue reading

The Many Faces of Sustainable Intensification

Food advocates and policymakers offer ‘sustainable intensification’ as a way to feed a growing world population. But its general definition—to increase food output from existing farmland while minimizing pressure on the environment—can be interpreted in various ways: some good, some bad. The extent to which sustainable intensification feeds more people while preserving limited resources depends on which definition people are referring to: Continue reading

New FCRN Briefings: Succinct, Comprehensive Exploration of China’s Changing Food Landscape

China figures prominently in discussions of nearly all global issues, whether they be trade, industry, sustainability, geopolitics, climate change, or economic development. This is largely because it is home to around one-fifth of humanity and much of the world’s industrial production. It is a place where when things happen, they happen in a big way. This is no different in terms of our global food system; how could an emerging country with almost 20% of the world’s consumers not be of great importance?

Beyond its sheer size, China’s food system deserves attention because the dietary transition there—which has mirrored its dramatic economic transition in recent decades—provides a glimpse into what seems to be in store for much of the developing world; a food landscape increasingly comprised of processed and animal-source foods (meat, eggs, and dairy products). The production and consumption of these foods has lead to a host of negative impacts, especially in terms of sustainability, public health, animal welfare, and the environment.

To provide some much needed insight into the characteristics and impacts of this monumental shift in China’s food system, The Food and Climate Research Network (FCRN) just released a series of nine briefing papers based largely on its 2014 report “Appetite for change: social, economic and environmental transformations in China’s food system.” [full report] The authors touch on many aspects of China’s changing food system—from the environmental to public health, the economy, supply chains, socio-cultural factors, and the composition of the livestock sector. Among other things, they argue that these shifts are being driven primarily by economic growth and urbanization.

Continue reading

China Study Notes: Introduction

The following are some key ideas from the Introduction of The China Study:

  • We are surrounded by a toxic food environment that even bombards children with junk food marketing.
  • People are told such a range of dietary recommendations; much of it in the form of fad diets and junk science.
  • Yet two-thirds of Americans are overweight and suffering from a host of chronic, diet-related diseases such as heart disease, autoimmune diseases, type 2diabetes, and a range of cancers.
  • Diet can be the most profound way to prevent, treat, and even reverse many of these diseases; in particular, through a whole foods, plant-based diet.
  • Cancer cells can literally be turned on and off depending on the food we consume; animal proteins promote cancer cell growth while whole, plant-based foods tend to stop cancer growth.

Continue reading

Don’t Fear the China Study

The China Study is one of those books that many people discuss but not so many people have actually read. Admittedly, at 350+ pages, and with two bold subtitles, “The Most Comprehensive Study of Nutrition Ever Conducted” and “Startling Implications for Diet, Weight Loss, and Long-term Health,” it doesn’t exactly scream ‘light summer read’—and anyway, people can get the basic gist of Dr. T. Colin Campbell’s work by watching the critically-acclaimed documentary, Forks Over Knives. But those who read the book will find it rewarding and informative.

The book’s main argument is that a whole-foods, plant-based diet can prevent and even reverse a host of chronic diseases associated with the consumption of a western-style diet high in animal-source and processed foods. It has become Dr. Campbell’s life work to spread this message to a public that is misled and misguided by government regulators, food producers, and longstanding cultural preferences for consuming animal-source foods.

Continue reading

USDA to recommend eating less meat for the environment?

Every five years, the US government’s official dietary guidelines get updated with input from The Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, a high-level panel of scientific and medical experts on health, who submit their recommendations to the Secretaries of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The committee’s recommendations factor heavily in the USDA’s dietary guidelines and the government’s general stance on a number of food policy issues.

The most recent committee recommendations, the Scientific Report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, just came out today, and while the message that dietary cholesterol is not as much of a risk as previously believed has gotten a lot of media attention, there have been some other messages related to animal-based foods:  Continue reading


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.